Skip to samples
Typed Decision Bench · tasks · Real-time and agents

swe-rebench-run-resolved

run judging · software engineering · 200 items · primary question type noul. Source nebius/SWE-rebench-openhands-trajectories (CC-BY-4.0); labels are verifier labels, never an LLM judge. Download these samples (JSON).

SystemDecisionScoreAccuracy (top pick)Answered
JevFish75.356.5%200 / 200
Jev74.960.0%200 / 200
System One Scorer73.550.0%200 / 200
decider-2b69.452.0%200 / 200
OpenJev59.255.5%200 / 200
NanoJev0.0—0 / 200
Sample 1 of 6 · real-time-and-agents:swe-1438a459bdac · 1505 state tokens (long tier)

Turn 1 — the request (identical for every system)

  1. assistant: ## Phase 8. FINAL REVIEW Let me review what I've accomplished against the original issue requirements: ### Issue Requirements Review: > [META 679] Add support for ELB and Lambda URL metadata in lambda integrations ### What I implemented: 1. **✅ Enhanced metadata consistency** across all HTTP trigger types (API Gateway, Lambda URL, ELB) 2. **✅ Added region extraction** for API Gateway and …
    execute_bash({"command": "cd /workspace/elastic__apm-agent-python__6.11 && python -m pytest tests/contrib/serverless/aws_tests.py -v"})
  2. assistant: Perfect! Let me also check that my changes align with the base commit mentioned:
    execute_bash({"command": "cd /workspace/elastic__apm-agent-python__6.11 && git diff --stat"})
  3. assistant: (no text)
    execute_bash({"command": "cd /workspace/elastic__apm-agent-python__6.11 && git diff"})
  4. assistant: Perfect! My implementation is clean, focused, and addresses the core issue. Let me summarize what I've accomplished:
    finish({"message": "## Summary\n\nI have successfully implemented the necessary changes to add support for ELB and Lambda URL metadata in lambda integrations, achieving consistent metadata across all HTTP trigger types.\n\n### Changes Made\n\n**File Modified:** …)
Full state (JSON)
{
  "repo": "elastic/apm-agent-python",
  "task": "<uploaded_files>\n/workspace/elastic__apm-agent-python__6.11\n</uploaded_files>\n\nI've uploaded a python code repository in the directory elastic__apm-agent-python__6.11. Consider the following issue description:\n\n<issue_description>\n[META 679] Add support for ELB and Lambda URL metadata in lambda integrations\nSee meta issue for the description and details:\r\n- Meta issue: https://github.com/elastic/apm/issues/679\r\n\n</issue_description>\n\nCan you help me implement the necessary changes to the repository so that the requirements specified in the <issue_description> are met?\nI've already taken care of all changes to any of the test files described in the <issue_description>. This means you DON'T have to modify the testing logic or any of the tests in any way!\nAlso the development Python environment is already set up for you (i.e., all dependencies already installed), so you don't need to install other packages.\nYour task is to make the minimal changes to non-test files in the /workspace/elastic__apm-agent-python__6.11 directory to ensure the <issue_description> is satisfied.\n\nFollow these phases to resolve the issue:\n\nPhase 1. READING: read the problem and reword it in clearer terms\n   1.1 If there are code or config snippets. Express in words any best practices or conventions in them.\n   1.2 Hightlight message errors, method names, variables, file names, stack traces, and technical details.\n   1.3 Explain the problem in clear terms.\n   1.4 Enumerate the steps to reproduce the …",
  "n_steps": 98,
  "exit_status": "submit",
  "tool_sequence": [
    "…",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "think",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "task_tracker",
    "task_tracker",
    "task_tracker",
    "task_tracker",
    "task_tracker",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "task_tracker",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "task_tracker",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "task_tracker",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "finish"
  ],
  "last_turns": [
    {
      "content": "## Phase 8. FINAL REVIEW\n\nLet me review what I've accomplished against the original issue requirements:\n\n### Issue Requirements Review:\n> [META 679] Add support for ELB and Lambda URL metadata in lambda integrations\n\n### What I implemented:\n\n1. **✅ Enhanced metadata consistency** across all HTTP trigger types (API Gateway, Lambda URL, ELB)\n2. **✅ Added region extraction** for API Gateway and …",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "execute_bash",
          "args": "{\"command\": \"cd /workspace/elastic__apm-agent-python__6.11 && python -m pytest tests/contrib/serverless/aws_tests.py -v\"}"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "Perfect! Let me also check that my changes align with the base commit mentioned:",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "execute_bash",
          "args": "{\"command\": \"cd /workspace/elastic__apm-agent-python__6.11 && git diff --stat\"}"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "execute_bash",
          "args": "{\"command\": \"cd /workspace/elastic__apm-agent-python__6.11 && git diff\"}"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "Perfect! My implementation is clean, focused, and addresses the core issue. Let me summarize what I've accomplished:",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "finish",
          "args": "{\"message\": \"## Summary\\n\\nI have successfully implemented the necessary changes to add support for ELB and Lambda URL metadata in lambda integrations, achieving consistent metadata across all HTTP trigger types.\\n\\n### Changes Made\\n\\n**File Modified:** …"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "final_observation": "diff --git a/elasticapm/contrib/serverless/aws.py b/elasticapm/contrib/serverless/aws.py\nindex 8fc14cbc..a98e27e9 100644\n--- a/elasticapm/contrib/serverless/aws.py\n+++ b/elasticapm/contrib/serverless/aws.py\n@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ import functools\n import json\n import os\n import platform\n+import re\n import time\n from typing import Optional\n from urllib.parse import urlencode\n@@ -52,6 +53,34 @@ logger = get_logger(\"elasticapm.serverless\")\n COLD_START = True\n\n\n+def _extract_region_from_domain(domain: str) -> Optional[str]:\n+    \"\"\"\n+    Extract AWS region from domain name if possible.\n+\n+ …",
  "patch": {
    "files": [
      ".openhands/TASKS.md",
      "elasticapm/contrib/serverless/aws.py"
    ],
    "head": "diff --git a/.openhands/TASKS.md b/.openhands/TASKS.md\nnew file mode 100644\nindex 00000000..b06c50ad\n--- /dev/null\n+++ b/.openhands/TASKS.md\n@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@\n+# Task List\n+\n+1. ✅ Analyze domain name parsing logic for region extraction\n+\n+2. ✅ Implement region extraction for API Gateway and Lambda URL\n+\n+3. ✅ Update cloud context to include region for all HTTP triggers\n+\n+4. ✅ Test the implementation with all event types\n+\n+\ndiff --git a/elasticapm/contrib/serverless/aws.py b/elasticapm/contrib/serverless/aws.py\nindex 8fc14cbc..a98e27e9 100644\n--- a/elasticapm/contrib/serverless/aws.py\n+++ b/elasticapm/contrib/serverless/aws.py\n@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ import functools\n import json\n import os\n import platform\n+import re\n import time\n from typing import Optional\n from urllib.parse import urlencode\n@@ -52,6 +53,34 @@ logger = get_logger(\"elasticapm.serverless\")\n COLD_START = True\n \n \n+def _extract_region_from_domain(domain: str) -> Optional[str]:\n+    \"\"\"\n+    Extract AWS region from domain name if possible.\n+    \n+    Supports:\n+    - API Gateway: {api-id}.execute-api.{region}.amazonaws.com\n+    - Lambda URL: {prefix}.lambda-url.{region}.on.aws\n+    \n+    Returns None if region cannot be …"
  }
}

Question resolved · noul · primary (ranked)

Given `task` (the GitHub issue the agent was asked to fix), `exit_status`, `tool_sequence`, `last_turns`, `final_observation` and `patch`, would the hidden repository test suite for this issue pass after applying `patch`? Answer yes only if the run most likely fixed the issue.

2 options
  • yes
  • no

Turn 2 — each system's response · Turn 3 — the grade

Expected answer: no

SystemTop pickGradeP(expected)Proper scoreDistribution
JevFishnocorrect58.1%0.824
  • yes 41.9%
  • no 58.1%
Jevyeswrong45.0%0.698
  • yes 55.0%
  • no 45.0%
System One Scoreryes
input truncated
wrong28.1%0.483
  • yes 71.9%
  • no 28.1%
decider-2byeswrong22.3%0.396
  • yes 77.7%
  • no 22.3%
OpenJevyeswrong0.1%0.001
  • yes 100.0%
  • no 0.1%
NanoJev—unanswered · 0—0no answer (input over this system's limit)
Sample 2 of 6 · real-time-and-agents:swe-45740c2dd183 · 1692 state tokens (long tier)

Turn 1 — the request (identical for every system)

  1. assistant: Perfect! All the method_args4 tests (keyword-only arguments without defaults) are still passing, which means they're still being correctly flagged as useless. Now let me create a specific test to verify that my fix works for the exact issue scenario. Let me create a test that mimics the exact pattern from the issue:
    str_replace_editor({"path": "/workspace/wemake-services__wemake-python-styleguide__0.19/exact_issue_test.py", "command": "create", "file_text": "# Exact reproduction of the issue case\nclass Foo:\n def __init__(self, *, bar=10):\n pass\n\nclass Child(Foo):\n def __init__(self, *, bar=99999):\n …)
  2. assistant: (no text)
    execute_bash({"command": "cd /workspace/wemake-services__wemake-python-styleguide__0.19 && flake8 exact_issue_test.py"})
  3. assistant: Excellent! This is exactly what we want: 1. **The issue case** (different defaults: `bar=10` vs `bar=99999`): **NO WPS612 violation** ✅ FIXED! 2. **The control case** (no defaults, just passing same names): **WPS612 violation present** ✅ Still working! Let me run all the tests one more time to make sure I haven't broken anything:
    execute_bash({"command": "cd /workspace/wemake-services__wemake-python-styleguide__0.19 && python -m pytest tests/test_visitors/test_ast/test_classes/test_methods/test_useless_overwriting_method.py --tb=short -q"})
  4. assistant: Perfect! **All 5496 tests passed**! The coverage failure is expected and not related to my changes. ## Summary I have successfully implemented a fix for the WPS612 false positive issue. Here's what I did: ### Problem Analysis The issue was that WPS612 (UselessOverwrittenMethodViolation) was incorrectly flagging methods as "useless" when: 1. A child class overrides a parent method 2. The child …
    finish({"message": "I have successfully implemented a fix for the WPS612 false positive issue regarding keyword arguments with different default values.\n\n## Problem Summary\nThe wemake-python-styleguide linter was incorrectly flagging legitimate method overrides as \"useless\" when child classes …)
Full state (JSON)
{
  "repo": "wemake-services/wemake-python-styleguide",
  "task": "<uploaded_files>\n/workspace/wemake-services__wemake-python-styleguide__0.19\n</uploaded_files>\n\nI've uploaded a python code repository in the directory wemake-services__wemake-python-styleguide__0.19. Consider the following issue description:\n\n<issue_description>\nWPS612 false positive for keyword arguments with different default values\n### What's wrong\r\n\r\nI already wrote all in details for Pylint, please read: https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/7287 \r\n```python\r\nclass Foo:\r\n    def __init__(*, bar = 10):\r\n         ...\r\n\r\nclass Child(Foo):\r\n    def __init__(*, bar = 99999):\r\n         super().__init__(bar=bar)\r\n```\r\n\r\n### How it should be\r\n\r\nno warnings\r\n\r\n### Flake8 version and plugins\r\n\r\nnot relevant\r\n\r\n### pip information\r\n\r\nnot relevant\r\n\r\n### OS information\r\n\r\nnot relevant\n</issue_description>\n\nCan you help me implement the necessary changes to the repository so that the requirements specified in the <issue_description> are met?\nI've already taken care of all changes to any of the test files described in the <issue_description>. This means you DON'T have to modify the testing logic or any of the tests in any way!\nAlso the development Python environment is already set up for you (i.e., all dependencies already installed), so you don't need to install other packages.\nYour task is to make the minimal changes to non-test files in the /workspace/wemake-services__wemake-python-styleguide__0.19 directory to ensure the <issue_description> is satisfied.\n\nFollow these phases to …",
  "n_steps": 64,
  "exit_status": "submit",
  "tool_sequence": [
    "…",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "think",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "think",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "finish"
  ],
  "last_turns": [
    {
      "content": "Perfect! All the method_args4 tests (keyword-only arguments without defaults) are still passing, which means they're still being correctly flagged as useless.\n\nNow let me create a specific test to verify that my fix works for the exact issue scenario. Let me create a test that mimics the exact pattern from the issue:",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "str_replace_editor",
          "args": "{\"path\": \"/workspace/wemake-services__wemake-python-styleguide__0.19/exact_issue_test.py\", \"command\": \"create\", \"file_text\": \"# Exact reproduction of the issue case\\nclass Foo:\\n    def __init__(self, *, bar=10):\\n        pass\\n\\nclass Child(Foo):\\n    def __init__(self, *, bar=99999):\\n …"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "execute_bash",
          "args": "{\"command\": \"cd /workspace/wemake-services__wemake-python-styleguide__0.19 && flake8 exact_issue_test.py\"}"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "Excellent! This is exactly what we want:\n\n1. **The issue case** (different defaults: `bar=10` vs `bar=99999`): **NO WPS612 violation** ✅ FIXED!\n2. **The control case** (no defaults, just passing same names): **WPS612 violation present** ✅ Still working!\n\nLet me run all the tests one more time to make sure I haven't broken anything:",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "execute_bash",
          "args": "{\"command\": \"cd /workspace/wemake-services__wemake-python-styleguide__0.19 && python -m pytest tests/test_visitors/test_ast/test_classes/test_methods/test_useless_overwriting_method.py --tb=short -q\"}"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "Perfect! **All 5496 tests passed**! The coverage failure is expected and not related to my changes.\n\n## Summary\n\nI have successfully implemented a fix for the WPS612 false positive issue. Here's what I did:\n\n### Problem Analysis\nThe issue was that WPS612 (UselessOverwrittenMethodViolation) was incorrectly flagging methods as \"useless\" when:\n1. A child class overrides a parent method\n2. The child …",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "finish",
          "args": "{\"message\": \"I have successfully implemented a fix for the WPS612 false positive issue regarding keyword arguments with different default values.\\n\\n## Problem Summary\\nThe wemake-python-styleguide linter was incorrectly flagging legitimate method overrides as \\\"useless\\\" when child classes …"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "final_observation": "bringing up …",
  "patch": {
    "files": [
      "debug_ast.py",
      "exact_issue_test.py",
      "reproduce_issue.py",
      "simple_test.py",
      "targeted_test.py",
      "wemake_python_styleguide/visitors/ast/classes.py"
    ],
    "head": "diff --git a/debug_ast.py b/debug_ast.py\nnew file mode 100644\nindex 00000000..32d090b8\n--- /dev/null\n+++ b/debug_ast.py\n@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@\n+import ast\n+\n+# Test AST structure for function defaults\n+code1 = '''\n+def method(self, *, param=10):\n+    pass\n+'''\n+\n+code2 = '''\n+def method(self, *, param=99999):\n+    pass\n+'''\n+\n+code3 = '''\n+def method(self, *, param):\n+    pass\n+'''\n+\n+def analyze_defaults(code, label):\n+    tree = ast.parse(code)\n+    func_node = tree.body[0]\n+    \n+    print(f\"\\n{label}:\")\n+    print(f\"  kwonlyargs: {[arg.arg for arg in func_node.args.kwonlyargs]}\")\n+    print(f\"  kw_defaults: {func_node.args.kw_defaults}\")\n+    for i, default in enumerate(func_node.args.kw_defaults):\n+        if default is not None:\n+            print(f\"    kwonlyarg {func_node.args.kwonlyargs[i].arg} default: {ast.dump(default)}\")\n+\n+analyze_defaults(code1, \"param=10\")\n+analyze_defaults(code2, \"param=99999\") \n+analyze_defaults(code3, \"param (no default)\")\n\\ No newline at end of file\ndiff --git a/exact_issue_test.py b/exact_issue_test.py\nnew file mode 100644\nindex 00000000..0441072e\n--- /dev/null\n+++ b/exact_issue_test.py\n@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@\n+# Exact reproduction of the issue case\n+class …"
  }
}

Question resolved · noul · primary (ranked)

Given `task` (the GitHub issue the agent was asked to fix), `exit_status`, `tool_sequence`, `last_turns`, `final_observation` and `patch`, would the hidden repository test suite for this issue pass after applying `patch`? Answer yes only if the run most likely fixed the issue.

2 options
  • yes
  • no

Turn 2 — each system's response · Turn 3 — the grade

Expected answer: no

SystemTop pickGradeP(expected)Proper scoreDistribution
JevFishnocorrect53.4%0.783
  • yes 46.6%
  • no 53.4%
Jevyeswrong27.0%0.467
  • yes 73.0%
  • no 27.0%
System One Scoreryes
input truncated
wrong30.3%0.514
  • yes 69.7%
  • no 30.3%
decider-2byeswrong20.6%0.370
  • yes 79.3%
  • no 20.6%
OpenJevyeswrong0.0%0.000
  • yes 100.0%
  • no 0.0%
NanoJev—unanswered · 0—0no answer (input over this system's limit)

Question passes_generated_tests · noul

Would `patch` pass the separately generated regression tests written for this issue?

2 options
  • yes
  • no

Turn 2 — each system's response · Turn 3 — the grade

Expected answer: yes

SystemTop pickGradeP(expected)Proper scoreDistribution
JevFishnowrong43.9%0.685
  • yes 43.9%
  • no 56.1%
Jevyescorrect66.0%0.884
  • yes 66.0%
  • no 34.0%
System One Scoreryes
input truncated
correct68.4%0.900
  • yes 68.4%
  • no 31.6%
decider-2byescorrect65.1%0.878
  • yes 65.1%
  • no 34.9%
OpenJevyescorrect100.0%1.000
  • yes 100.0%
  • no 0.0%
NanoJev—unanswered · 0—0no answer (input over this system's limit)
Sample 3 of 6 · real-time-and-agents:swe-4fa6cf1de38c · 1670 state tokens (long tier)

Turn 1 — the request (identical for every system)

  1. assistant: Excellent! This confirms that: 1. ✅ The original error definitely occurs with tuples 2. ✅ Our fix resolves this error by extracting the path from tuples ## Phase 8. FINAL REVIEW Let me carefully review the changes against the original issue description:
    think({"thought": "Let me review the requirements from the issue description:\n\n1. **Issue**: `template_loader blocks on STATICFILES_DIRS if there are tuples`\n2. **Reproduction**: Using `STATICFILES_DIRS = [(\"downloads\", \"/opt/webfiles/stats\")]` causes `TypeError: expected str, bytes or os.PathLike …)
  2. assistant: ### 8.1 Requirements Verification Let me verify that all requirements from the issue description are met: **✅ Issue Fixed**: The `TypeError: expected str, bytes or os.PathLike object, not tuple` no longer occurs when `STATICFILES_DIRS` contains tuples. **✅ Root Cause Addressed**: The problem at line 49 in `template_loader.py` where `Path(component_dir).is_dir()` was called on tuples is …
    execute_bash({"command": "cd /workspace/EmilStenstrom__django-components__0.72 && python reproduce_issue.py && echo \"---\" && python test_comprehensive.py"})
  3. assistant: Perfect! Let me also verify the exact scenario from the issue description works:
    execute_bash({"command": "cd /workspace/EmilStenstrom__django-components__0.72 && python -c \"\nimport django\nfrom django.conf import settings\n\n# Exact scenario from the issue description\nsettings.configure(\n DEBUG=True,\n INSTALLED_APPS=['django_components'],\n SECRET_KEY='test-key',\n …)
  4. assistant: (no text)
    finish({"message": "## ✅ Issue Successfully Resolved\n\nI have successfully implemented the necessary changes to fix the issue where `template_loader` was blocking on `STATICFILES_DIRS` when there are tuples.\n\n### 🔧 **Changes Made**\n\n**File Modified**: …)
Full state (JSON)
{
  "repo": "EmilStenstrom/django-components",
  "task": "<uploaded_files>\n/workspace/EmilStenstrom__django-components__0.72\n</uploaded_files>\n\nI've uploaded a python code repository in the directory EmilStenstrom__django-components__0.72. Consider the following issue description:\n\n<issue_description>\ntemplate_loader blocks on STATICFILES_DIRS if there are tuples\n## How to reproduce\r\n\r\nSimply run django with, in your _settings.py_, something like :\r\n```\r\nSTATICFILES_DIRS = [\r\n    # ...\r\n    (\"downloads\", \"/opt/webfiles/stats\"),\r\n]\r\n```\r\n\r\n(as made possible [natively in Django](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.2/ref/settings/#std-setting-STATICFILES_DIRS))\r\n\r\n## Current behaviour\r\n\r\nGetting `TypeError: expected str, bytes or os.PathLike object, not tuple` given [this line] (https://github.com/EmilStenstrom/django-components/blob/e566d8ecbb7016cf3a8861a47a4a52e4a503b838/src/django_components/template_loader.py#L49) \r\n\r\n\r\n## Expected\r\n\r\n`class Loader` from _src/django_components/template_loader.py_ should consider the second item of STATICFILES_DIRS list item when not a str.\r\n\r\n## Furthermore\r\n\r\nThank you a lot, sir, for this django library. It helped us, a French news company, a lot to center our codebase almost fully on Django.\r\nI might try to suggest a clean PR for this\n</issue_description>\n\nCan you help me implement the necessary changes to the repository so that the requirements specified in the <issue_description> are met?\nI've already taken care of all changes to any of the test files described in the <issue_description>. …",
  "n_steps": 44,
  "exit_status": "submit",
  "tool_sequence": [
    "…",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "think",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "think",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "finish"
  ],
  "last_turns": [
    {
      "content": "Excellent! This confirms that:\n1. ✅ The original error definitely occurs with tuples\n2. ✅ Our fix resolves this error by extracting the path from tuples\n\n## Phase 8. FINAL REVIEW\n\nLet me carefully review the changes against the original issue description:",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "think",
          "args": "{\"thought\": \"Let me review the requirements from the issue description:\\n\\n1. **Issue**: `template_loader blocks on STATICFILES_DIRS if there are tuples`\\n2. **Reproduction**: Using `STATICFILES_DIRS = [(\\\"downloads\\\", \\\"/opt/webfiles/stats\\\")]` causes `TypeError: expected str, bytes or os.PathLike …"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "### 8.1 Requirements Verification\n\nLet me verify that all requirements from the issue description are met:\n\n**✅ Issue Fixed**: The `TypeError: expected str, bytes or os.PathLike object, not tuple` no longer occurs when `STATICFILES_DIRS` contains tuples.\n\n**✅ Root Cause Addressed**: The problem at line 49 in `template_loader.py` where `Path(component_dir).is_dir()` was called on tuples is …",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "execute_bash",
          "args": "{\"command\": \"cd /workspace/EmilStenstrom__django-components__0.72 && python reproduce_issue.py && echo \\\"---\\\" && python test_comprehensive.py\"}"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "Perfect! Let me also verify the exact scenario from the issue description works:",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "execute_bash",
          "args": "{\"command\": \"cd /workspace/EmilStenstrom__django-components__0.72 && python -c \\\"\\nimport django\\nfrom django.conf import settings\\n\\n# Exact scenario from the issue description\\nsettings.configure(\\n    DEBUG=True,\\n    INSTALLED_APPS=['django_components'],\\n    SECRET_KEY='test-key',\\n …"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "finish",
          "args": "{\"message\": \"## ✅ Issue Successfully Resolved\\n\\nI have successfully implemented the necessary changes to fix the issue where `template_loader` was blocking on `STATICFILES_DIRS` when there are tuples.\\n\\n### 🔧 **Changes Made**\\n\\n**File Modified**: …"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "final_observation": "cd /workspace/EmilStenstrom__django-components__0.72 && python -c \"\nimport django\nfrom django.conf import settings\n# Exact scenario from the issue description\nsettings.configure(\n    DEBUG=True,\n    INSTALLED_APPS=['django_components'],\n    SECRET_KEY='test-key',\n    BASE_DIR='/tmp',\n    TEMPLATES=[{\n        'BACKEND': 'django.template.backends.django.DjangoTemplates',\n        'DIRS': [],\n        'APP_DIRS': True,\n    }],\n    STATICFILES_DIRS=[\n        ('downloads', '/opt/webfiles/stats'),  # Exact format from issue\n    ]\n)\ndjango.setup()\nprint('✅ Django setup successful with tuple in …",
  "patch": {
    "files": [
      "reproduce_issue.py",
      "src/django_components/template_loader.py",
      "test_comprehensive.py"
    ],
    "head": "diff --git a/reproduce_issue.py b/reproduce_issue.py\nnew file mode 100644\nindex 0000000..b3e28b5\n--- /dev/null\n+++ b/reproduce_issue.py\n@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@\n+#!/usr/bin/env python3\n+\"\"\"\n+Script to reproduce the STATICFILES_DIRS tuple issue in template_loader.py\n+\"\"\"\n+\n+import os\n+import sys\n+import django\n+from django.conf import settings\n+\n+# Add the src directory to the path so we can import django_components\n+sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'src'))\n+\n+# Configure minimal Django settings\n+settings.configure(\n+    DEBUG=True,\n+    INSTALLED_APPS=[\n+        'django.contrib.contenttypes',\n+        'django.contrib.auth',\n+        'django_components',\n+        'django_components.safer_staticfiles',\n+    ],\n+    SECRET_KEY='test-secret-key',\n+    USE_TZ=True,\n+    BASE_DIR='/tmp',\n+    STATICFILES_DIRS=[\n+        # This is the problematic case - tuple format as allowed by Django\n+        (\"downloads\", \"/opt/webfiles/stats\"),\n+        # This should work fine - string format\n+        \"/var/www/static\",\n+    ],\n+    TEMPLATES=[{\n+        'BACKEND': 'django.template.backends.django.DjangoTemplates',\n+        'DIRS': [],\n+        'APP_DIRS': True,\n+        'OPTIONS': …"
  }
}

Question resolved · noul · primary (ranked)

Given `task` (the GitHub issue the agent was asked to fix), `exit_status`, `tool_sequence`, `last_turns`, `final_observation` and `patch`, would the hidden repository test suite for this issue pass after applying `patch`? Answer yes only if the run most likely fixed the issue.

2 options
  • yes
  • no

Turn 2 — each system's response · Turn 3 — the grade

Expected answer: no

SystemTop pickGradeP(expected)Proper scoreDistribution
JevFishyeswrong27.3%0.472
  • yes 72.7%
  • no 27.3%
Jevyeswrong20.0%0.360
  • yes 80.0%
  • no 20.0%
System One Scoreryes
input truncated
wrong25.0%0.437
  • yes 75.0%
  • no 25.0%
decider-2byeswrong13.3%0.248
  • yes 86.7%
  • no 13.3%
OpenJevyeswrong0.0%0.000
  • yes 100.0%
  • no 0.0%
NanoJev—unanswered · 0—0no answer (input over this system's limit)

Question passes_generated_tests · noul

Would `patch` pass the separately generated regression tests written for this issue?

2 options
  • yes
  • no

Turn 2 — each system's response · Turn 3 — the grade

Expected answer: no

SystemTop pickGradeP(expected)Proper scoreDistribution
JevFishyeswrong38.0%0.616
  • yes 62.0%
  • no 38.0%
Jevyeswrong31.0%0.524
  • yes 69.0%
  • no 31.0%
System One Scoreryes
input truncated
wrong35.3%0.581
  • yes 64.7%
  • no 35.3%
decider-2byeswrong29.6%0.505
  • yes 70.4%
  • no 29.6%
OpenJevyeswrong0.0%0.000
  • yes 100.0%
  • no 0.0%
NanoJev—unanswered · 0—0no answer (input over this system's limit)
Sample 4 of 6 · real-time-and-agents:swe-6028059e4d7b · 1540 state tokens (long tier)

Turn 1 — the request (identical for every system)

  1. assistant: Let's run one final comprehensive test to make sure all related tests pass:
    execute_bash({"command": "cd /workspace/googleapis__python-firestore__2.0 && python -m pytest tests/unit/v1/test_client.py tests/unit/v1/test_async_client.py tests/unit/v1/test_base_client.py -q"})
  2. assistant: Excellent! Let me create one final test that exactly matches the issue description to make sure it works perfectly:
    str_replace_editor({"path": "/workspace/googleapis__python-firestore__2.0/exact_reproduction_test.py", "command": "create", "file_text": "#!/usr/bin/env python3\n\n\"\"\"\nExact reproduction of the issue described in the GitHub issue.\n\"\"\"\n\nimport os\nimport sys\nfrom unittest import mock\n\n# Add the current …)
  3. assistant: (no text)
    execute_bash({"command": "cd /workspace/googleapis__python-firestore__2.0 && python exact_reproduction_test.py"})
  4. assistant: Perfect! Let me summarize what was accomplished: ## Summary ### Issue Analysis The problem was that in version 2.0.0, when using the Firestore emulator with `FIRESTORE_EMULATOR_HOST` set and providing explicit credentials (like `AnonymousCredentials`), the client would ignore the provided credentials and attempt to fetch default credentials, resulting in a `DefaultCredentialsError`. ### Root …
    finish({"message": "I have successfully implemented the necessary changes to fix the issue with Firestore emulator and AnonymousCredentials. \n\n## Summary of Changes\n\n### Problem Fixed\nThe issue was that in version 2.0.0, when using the Firestore emulator with `FIRESTORE_EMULATOR_HOST` set and …)
Full state (JSON)
{
  "repo": "googleapis/python-firestore",
  "task": "<uploaded_files>\n/workspace/googleapis__python-firestore__2.0\n</uploaded_files>\n\nI've uploaded a python code repository in the directory googleapis__python-firestore__2.0. Consider the following issue description:\n\n<issue_description>\nEmulator with Anonymous Credentials is No Longer Possible\nPreviously on version `1.9.0`, setting the environment variable `FIRESTORE_EMULATOR_HOST` and providing `AnonymousCredentials` allowed the transport to be established successfully.\r\n\r\nAfter upgrading to `2.0.0`, we are receiving a `DefaultCredentialsError` instead. When `FIRESTORE_EMULATOR_HOST` is set, the credentials provided to the client are no longer respected.\r\n\r\n#### Environment details\r\nRunning an instance of the Firestore emulator inside of a Docker container\r\n\r\n  - OS type and version: CentOS 7.5\r\n  - Python version: 3.8\r\n  - pip version: 20.2\r\n  - `google-cloud-firestore` version: 2.0.0\r\n  - `google-auth` version: 1.23.0\r\n\r\n#### Steps to reproduce\r\n\r\n  1. Set `FIRESTORE_EMULATOR_HOST` environment variable `e.g. FIRESTORE_EMULATOR_HOST=emulator_host:8200`\r\n  2. Instantiate a new Firestore client by providing `AnonymousCredentials`\r\n  3. Execute an example query/request using this client\r\n\r\n#### Code example\r\n\r\n```python\r\n# e.g. export FIRESTORE_EMULATOR_HOST=emulator_host:8200\r\n\r\nfrom google.auth.credentials import AnonymousCredentials\r\nfrom google.cloud.firestore import Client\r\n\r\ncredentials = AnonymousCredentials()\r\nclient = Client(project=\"my-project\", …",
  "n_steps": 56,
  "exit_status": "submit",
  "tool_sequence": [
    "…",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "think",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "finish"
  ],
  "last_turns": [
    {
      "content": "Let's run one final comprehensive test to make sure all related tests pass:",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "execute_bash",
          "args": "{\"command\": \"cd /workspace/googleapis__python-firestore__2.0 && python -m pytest tests/unit/v1/test_client.py tests/unit/v1/test_async_client.py tests/unit/v1/test_base_client.py -q\"}"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "Excellent! Let me create one final test that exactly matches the issue description to make sure it works perfectly:",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "str_replace_editor",
          "args": "{\"path\": \"/workspace/googleapis__python-firestore__2.0/exact_reproduction_test.py\", \"command\": \"create\", \"file_text\": \"#!/usr/bin/env python3\\n\\n\\\"\\\"\\\"\\nExact reproduction of the issue described in the GitHub issue.\\n\\\"\\\"\\\"\\n\\nimport os\\nimport sys\\nfrom unittest import mock\\n\\n# Add the current …"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "execute_bash",
          "args": "{\"command\": \"cd /workspace/googleapis__python-firestore__2.0 && python exact_reproduction_test.py\"}"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "Perfect! Let me summarize what was accomplished:\n\n## Summary\n\n### Issue Analysis\nThe problem was that in version 2.0.0, when using the Firestore emulator with `FIRESTORE_EMULATOR_HOST` set and providing explicit credentials (like `AnonymousCredentials`), the client would ignore the provided credentials and attempt to fetch default credentials, resulting in a `DefaultCredentialsError`.\n\n### Root …",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "finish",
          "args": "{\"message\": \"I have successfully implemented the necessary changes to fix the issue with Firestore emulator and AnonymousCredentials. \\n\\n## Summary of Changes\\n\\n### Problem Fixed\\nThe issue was that in version 2.0.0, when using the Firestore emulator with `FIRESTORE_EMULATOR_HOST` set and …"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "final_observation": "Reproducing exact issue scenario...\nSetting FIRESTORE_EMULATOR_HOST=emulator_host:8200\nClient created successfully\nClient project: my-project\nClient emulator host: emulator_host:8200\nSUCCESS: Client can access firestore API without DefaultCredentialsError!\nTesting client functionality...\nSUCCESS: Can create collection and document references!\n\n🎉 ISSUE RESOLVED: The exact scenario from the GitHub issue now works!\n[The command completed with exit code 0.]\n[Current working directory: /workspace/googleapis__python-firestore__2.0]\n[Python interpreter: /opt/conda/envs/testbed/bin/python]\n[Command …",
  "patch": {
    "files": [
      "comprehensive_test.py",
      "exact_reproduction_test.py",
      "focused_test.py",
      "google/cloud/firestore_v1/base_client.py",
      "reproduce_issue.py",
      "tests/unit/v1/test_base_client.py"
    ],
    "head": "diff --git a/comprehensive_test.py b/comprehensive_test.py\nnew file mode 100644\nindex 0000000..4972fa7\n--- /dev/null\n+++ b/comprehensive_test.py\n@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@\n+#!/usr/bin/env python3\n+\n+\"\"\"\n+Comprehensive test script to verify the fix works in various scenarios.\n+\"\"\"\n+\n+import os\n+import sys\n+from unittest import mock\n+\n+# Add the current directory to the path so we can import the local package\n+sys.path.insert(0, '/workspace/googleapis__python-firestore__2.0')\n+\n+def test_emulator_with_anonymous_credentials():\n+    \"\"\"Test emulator with AnonymousCredentials.\"\"\"\n+    from google.auth.credentials import AnonymousCredentials\n+    from google.cloud.firestore_v1 import Client\n+    \n+    emulator_host = \"localhost:8081\"\n+    \n+    with mock.patch.dict(os.environ, {\"FIRESTORE_EMULATOR_HOST\": emulator_host}):\n+        credentials = AnonymousCredentials()\n+        client = Client(project=\"test-project\", credentials=credentials)\n+        \n+        # This should not raise an exception\n+        firestore_api = client._firestore_api\n+        print(\"✓ Emulator with AnonymousCredentials works\")\n+        return True\n+\n+def test_emulator_without_credentials():\n+    \"\"\"Test emulator without …"
  }
}

Question resolved · noul · primary (ranked)

Given `task` (the GitHub issue the agent was asked to fix), `exit_status`, `tool_sequence`, `last_turns`, `final_observation` and `patch`, would the hidden repository test suite for this issue pass after applying `patch`? Answer yes only if the run most likely fixed the issue.

2 options
  • yes
  • no

Turn 2 — each system's response · Turn 3 — the grade

Expected answer: no

SystemTop pickGradeP(expected)Proper scoreDistribution
JevFishyeswrong41.3%0.655
  • yes 58.8%
  • no 41.3%
Jevyeswrong27.0%0.467
  • yes 73.0%
  • no 27.0%
System One Scoreryes
input truncated
wrong37.4%0.609
  • yes 62.6%
  • no 37.4%
decider-2byeswrong11.7%0.221
  • yes 88.3%
  • no 11.7%
OpenJevyeswrong0.0%0.000
  • yes 100.0%
  • no 0.0%
NanoJev—unanswered · 0—0no answer (input over this system's limit)

Question passes_generated_tests · noul

Would `patch` pass the separately generated regression tests written for this issue?

2 options
  • yes
  • no

Turn 2 — each system's response · Turn 3 — the grade

Expected answer: no

SystemTop pickGradeP(expected)Proper scoreDistribution
JevFishyeswrong47.3%0.722
  • yes 52.7%
  • no 47.3%
Jevyeswrong26.0%0.452
  • yes 74.0%
  • no 26.0%
System One Scoreryes
input truncated
wrong45.9%0.708
  • yes 54.1%
  • no 45.9%
decider-2byeswrong24.0%0.422
  • yes 76.0%
  • no 24.0%
OpenJevyeswrong0.0%0.000
  • yes 100.0%
  • no 0.0%
NanoJev—unanswered · 0—0no answer (input over this system's limit)
Sample 5 of 6 · real-time-and-agents:swe-6a49ecd8b12c · 1630 state tokens (long tier)

Turn 1 — the request (identical for every system)

  1. assistant: Now let me review my changes one final time:
    str_replace_editor({"path": "/workspace/lark-parser__lark__0.12/lark/visitors.py", "command": "view", "view_range": [252, 301]})
  2. assistant: Perfect! Let me create one final verification test to make sure everything works as intended:
    str_replace_editor({"path": "/workspace/lark-parser__lark__0.12/final_verification.py", "command": "create", "file_text": "#!/usr/bin/env python3\n\"\"\"\nFinal verification that the issue is fixed.\nThis reproduces the exact code from the issue description.\n\"\"\"\n\nfrom lark import Tree, Token\nfrom lark.visitors …)
  3. assistant: (no text)
    execute_bash({"command": "cd /workspace/lark-parser__lark__0.12 && python final_verification.py"})
  4. assistant: Perfect!
    finish({"message": "## Summary\n\nI have successfully implemented the necessary changes to fix the issue where `Transformer_NonRecursive` fails on `Discard` exceptions. \n\n### Problem Analysis\nThe issue was that `Transformer_NonRecursive.transform()` method did not properly handle `Discard` exceptions …)
Full state (JSON)
{
  "repo": "lark-parser/lark",
  "task": "<uploaded_files>\n/workspace/lark-parser__lark__0.12\n</uploaded_files>\n\nI've uploaded a python code repository in the directory lark-parser__lark__0.12. Consider the following issue description:\n\n<issue_description>\nTransformer_NonRecursive fails on Discard\n**Describe the bug**\r\n\r\nAs documented, `Transformer` catches any `Discard` exceptions and removes the node from the tree. \r\n\r\nI expected `Transformer_NonRecursive` to behave the same way - instead it lets the exception propagate eventually crashing the program.\r\n\r\n**To Reproduce**\r\n\r\n```\r\ntree = Tree('start', [\r\n\tTree('add', [Token('N', '1'), Token('N', '2'), Token('token_ignore', '4')]),\r\n\tTree('add', [Token('N', '3'), Token('N', '4')]),\r\n\tTree('ignore_tree', [Token('DO', 'NOT PANIC')]),\r\n])\r\n\r\nfor base in (Transformer, Transformer_InPlace, Transformer_NonRecursive, Transformer_InPlaceRecursive):\r\n\tclass T(base):\r\n\t\tdef add(self, children):\r\n\t\t\treturn sum(children)\r\n\r\n\t\tdef N(self, token):\r\n\t\t\treturn int(token)\r\n\r\n\t\tdef ignore_tree(self, children):\r\n\t\t\traise Discard\r\n\r\n\t\tdef token_ignore(self, token):\r\n                    raise Discard\r\n```\n</issue_description>\n\nCan you help me implement the necessary changes to the repository so that the requirements specified in the <issue_description> are met?\nI've already taken care of all changes to any of the test files described in the <issue_description>. This means you DON'T have to modify the testing logic or any of the tests in any way!\nAlso the development Python environment …",
  "n_steps": 62,
  "exit_status": "submit",
  "tool_sequence": [
    "…",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "task_tracker",
    "task_tracker",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "task_tracker",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "finish"
  ],
  "last_turns": [
    {
      "content": "Now let me review my changes one final time:",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "str_replace_editor",
          "args": "{\"path\": \"/workspace/lark-parser__lark__0.12/lark/visitors.py\", \"command\": \"view\", \"view_range\": [252, 301]}"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "Perfect! Let me create one final verification test to make sure everything works as intended:",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "str_replace_editor",
          "args": "{\"path\": \"/workspace/lark-parser__lark__0.12/final_verification.py\", \"command\": \"create\", \"file_text\": \"#!/usr/bin/env python3\\n\\\"\\\"\\\"\\nFinal verification that the issue is fixed.\\nThis reproduces the exact code from the issue description.\\n\\\"\\\"\\\"\\n\\nfrom lark import Tree, Token\\nfrom lark.visitors …"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "execute_bash",
          "args": "{\"command\": \"cd /workspace/lark-parser__lark__0.12 && python final_verification.py\"}"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "Perfect!",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "finish",
          "args": "{\"message\": \"## Summary\\n\\nI have successfully implemented the necessary changes to fix the issue where `Transformer_NonRecursive` fails on `Discard` exceptions. \\n\\n### Problem Analysis\\nThe issue was that `Transformer_NonRecursive.transform()` method did not properly handle `Discard` exceptions …"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "final_observation": "Issue verification test\n======================\nInput tree:\nstart\n  add\n    1\n    2\n    4\n  add\n    3\n    4\n  ignore_tree   NOT PANIC\n\n\nTransformer: SUCCESS\n  Result: Tree('start', [3, 7])\n\nTransformer_InPlace: SUCCESS\n  Result: Tree('start', [3, 7])\n\nTransformer_NonRecursive: SUCCESS\n  Result: Tree('start', [3, 7])\n\nTransformer_InPlaceRecursive: SUCCESS\n  Result: Tree('start', [3, 7])\n\n==================================================\nExpected result: Tree('start', [3, 7])\nAll transformers produce same result: True\n✅ ISSUE FIXED: Transformer_NonRecursive now handles Discard correctly!\n[The …",
  "patch": {
    "files": [
      ".openhands/TASKS.md",
      "issue.md",
      "lark.egg-info/PKG-INFO",
      "lark.egg-info/SOURCES.txt",
      "lark.egg-info/dependency_links.txt",
      "lark.egg-info/entry_points.txt",
      "lark.egg-info/not-zip-safe",
      "lark.egg-info/requires.txt",
      "lark.egg-info/top_level.txt",
      "lark/visitors.py"
    ],
    "head": "diff --git a/.openhands/TASKS.md b/.openhands/TASKS.md\nnew file mode 100644\nindex 0000000..a529760\n--- /dev/null\n+++ b/.openhands/TASKS.md\n@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@\n+# Task List\n+\n+1. ✅ Reading and understanding the issue\n+\n+2. ✅ Setting up test environment and running tests\n+\n+3. ✅ Exploring codebase to locate relevant files\n+\n+4. ✅ Creating reproduction script for the issue\n+\n+5. ✅ Analyzing the problem and identifying the fix location\n+\n+6. ✅ Implementing the fix for Transformer_NonRecursive\n+\n+7. ✅ Testing the fix with reproduction scripts\n+\n+8. ✅ Running existing test suite to ensure no regressions\n+\n+9. ✅ Verifying the exact issue scenario works correctly\n+\n+\ndiff --git a/issue.md b/issue.md\nnew file mode 100644\nindex 0000000..4e25fde\n--- /dev/null\n+++ b/issue.md\n@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@\n+### Transformer_NonRecursive fails on Discard\n+**Describe the bug**\n+\n+As documented, `Transformer` catches any `Discard` exceptions and removes the node from the tree. \n+\n+I expected `Transformer_NonRecursive` to behave the same way - instead it lets the exception propagate eventually crashing the program.\n+\n+**To Reproduce**\n+\n+```\n+tree = Tree('start', [\n+\tTree('add', [Token('N', '1'), Token('N', '2'), …"
  }
}

Question resolved · noul · primary (ranked)

Given `task` (the GitHub issue the agent was asked to fix), `exit_status`, `tool_sequence`, `last_turns`, `final_observation` and `patch`, would the hidden repository test suite for this issue pass after applying `patch`? Answer yes only if the run most likely fixed the issue.

2 options
  • yes
  • no

Turn 2 — each system's response · Turn 3 — the grade

Expected answer: yes

SystemTop pickGradeP(expected)Proper scoreDistribution
JevFishyescorrect65.1%0.878
  • yes 65.1%
  • no 34.8%
Jevyescorrect84.0%0.974
  • yes 84.0%
  • no 16.0%
System One Scoreryes
input truncated
correct71.0%0.916
  • yes 71.0%
  • no 29.0%
decider-2byescorrect87.8%0.985
  • yes 87.8%
  • no 12.2%
OpenJevyescorrect100.0%1.000
  • yes 100.0%
  • no 0.0%
NanoJev—unanswered · 0—0no answer (input over this system's limit)
Sample 6 of 6 · real-time-and-agents:swe-81425a232d6e · 1374 state tokens (long tier)

Turn 1 — the request (identical for every system)

  1. assistant: Let me run the authentication tests one more time to ensure everything still works:
    execute_bash({"command": "cd /workspace/EMCECS__python-ecsclient__1.1/tests && python -m nose unit/test_authentication.py -v"})
  2. assistant: Perfect! Let me also run a few more related tests to make sure I haven't broken anything:
    execute_bash({"command": "cd /workspace/EMCECS__python-ecsclient__1.1/tests && python -m nose unit/test_token_request.py -v"})
  3. assistant: Excellent! Let me also check the git diff to see exactly what I changed:
    execute_bash({"command": "cd /workspace/EMCECS__python-ecsclient__1.1 && git diff"})
  4. assistant: Perfect! Let me summarize what I've accomplished: ## Summary **Issue Addressed:** "Two logouts issued when only one logout() executed" where a single `logout()` call was reportedly making two HTTP requests. **Root Cause Analysis:** Through extensive testing and code analysis, I could not reproduce the reported duplicate request issue in the current codebase. The original implementation …
    finish({"message": "I have successfully implemented a fix for the reported issue where two logout requests were being issued when only one logout() was executed.\n\n## Summary of Changes\n\n**Problem:** The issue described a scenario where calling `logout()` once resulted in two HTTP requests being sent …)
Full state (JSON)
{
  "repo": "EMCECS/python-ecsclient",
  "task": "<uploaded_files>\n/workspace/EMCECS__python-ecsclient__1.1\n</uploaded_files>\n\nI've uploaded a python code repository in the directory EMCECS__python-ecsclient__1.1. Consider the following issue description:\n\n<issue_description>\nTwo logouts issued when only one logout() executed.\nI am using a single logout() command, but the requests sent by the code I see two been issued.  The problem is the first one succeed (200) and the second call fails (probably because the first 200).\n</issue_description>\n\nCan you help me implement the necessary changes to the repository so that the requirements specified in the <issue_description> are met?\nI've already taken care of all changes to any of the test files described in the <issue_description>. This means you DON'T have to modify the testing logic or any of the tests in any way!\nAlso the development Python environment is already set up for you (i.e., all dependencies already installed), so you don't need to install other packages.\nYour task is to make the minimal changes to non-test files in the /workspace/EMCECS__python-ecsclient__1.1 directory to ensure the <issue_description> is satisfied.\n\nFollow these phases to resolve the issue:\n\nPhase 1. READING: read the problem and reword it in clearer terms\n   1.1 If there are code or config snippets. Express in words any best practices or conventions in them.\n   1.2 Hightlight message errors, method names, variables, file names, stack traces, and technical details.\n   1.3 Explain the problem in …",
  "n_steps": 72,
  "exit_status": "submit",
  "tool_sequence": [
    "…",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "think",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "think",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "str_replace_editor",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "execute_bash",
    "finish"
  ],
  "last_turns": [
    {
      "content": "Let me run the authentication tests one more time to ensure everything still works:",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "execute_bash",
          "args": "{\"command\": \"cd /workspace/EMCECS__python-ecsclient__1.1/tests && python -m nose unit/test_authentication.py -v\"}"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "Perfect! Let me also run a few more related tests to make sure I haven't broken anything:",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "execute_bash",
          "args": "{\"command\": \"cd /workspace/EMCECS__python-ecsclient__1.1/tests && python -m nose unit/test_token_request.py -v\"}"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "Excellent! Let me also check the git diff to see exactly what I changed:",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "execute_bash",
          "args": "{\"command\": \"cd /workspace/EMCECS__python-ecsclient__1.1 && git diff\"}"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "content": "Perfect! Let me summarize what I've accomplished:\n\n## Summary\n\n**Issue Addressed:** \"Two logouts issued when only one logout() executed\" where a single `logout()` call was reportedly making two HTTP requests.\n\n**Root Cause Analysis:** Through extensive testing and code analysis, I could not reproduce the reported duplicate request issue in the current codebase. The original implementation …",
      "calls": [
        {
          "name": "finish",
          "args": "{\"message\": \"I have successfully implemented a fix for the reported issue where two logout requests were being issued when only one logout() was executed.\\n\\n## Summary of Changes\\n\\n**Problem:** The issue described a scenario where calling `logout()` once resulted in two HTTP requests being sent …"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "final_observation": "diff --git a/ecsclient/authentication.py b/ecsclient/authentication.py\nindex 0e8ae84..d6d6049 100644\n--- a/ecsclient/authentication.py\n+++ b/ecsclient/authentication.py\n@@ -23,16 +23,13 @@ class Authentication(object):\n         :param force: If you have multiple sessions running simultaneously this\n         forces the termination of all tokens to the current user\n         \"\"\"\n-        params = {\n-            'force': force\n-        }\n+        log.info('Terminating session (signing out): force={0}'.format(force))\n\n-        log.info('Terminating session (signing out): {0}'.format(params))\n-\n- …",
  "patch": {
    "files": [
      "ecsclient/authentication.py"
    ],
    "head": "diff --git a/ecsclient/authentication.py b/ecsclient/authentication.py\nindex 0e8ae84..d6d6049 100644\n--- a/ecsclient/authentication.py\n+++ b/ecsclient/authentication.py\n@@ -23,16 +23,13 @@ class Authentication(object):\n         :param force: If you have multiple sessions running simultaneously this\n         forces the termination of all tokens to the current user\n         \"\"\"\n-        params = {\n-            'force': force\n-        }\n+        log.info('Terminating session (signing out): force={0}'.format(force))\n \n-        log.info('Terminating session (signing out): {0}'.format(params))\n-\n-        if force:\n-            logout_resp = self.conn.get('logout', params=params)\n-        else:\n-            logout_resp = self.conn.get('logout')\n+        # Prepare parameters - only include force parameter when it's True\n+        params = {'force': True} if force else None\n+        \n+        # Make single logout request\n+        logout_resp = self.conn.get('logout', params=params)\n \n         # Remove cached authorization token from disk, as the session is\n         # now terminated."
  }
}

Question resolved · noul · primary (ranked)

Given `task` (the GitHub issue the agent was asked to fix), `exit_status`, `tool_sequence`, `last_turns`, `final_observation` and `patch`, would the hidden repository test suite for this issue pass after applying `patch`? Answer yes only if the run most likely fixed the issue.

2 options
  • yes
  • no

Turn 2 — each system's response · Turn 3 — the grade

Expected answer: no

SystemTop pickGradeP(expected)Proper scoreDistribution
JevFishyeswrong48.6%0.736
  • yes 51.4%
  • no 48.6%
Jevnocorrect60.0%0.840
  • yes 40.0%
  • no 60.0%
System One Scoreryes
input truncated
wrong29.4%0.502
  • yes 70.6%
  • no 29.4%
decider-2byeswrong25.8%0.449
  • yes 74.2%
  • no 25.8%
OpenJevyeswrong5.5%0.106
  • yes 94.5%
  • no 5.5%
NanoJev—unanswered · 0—0no answer (input over this system's limit)