swe-smith-run-resolved

{
  "repo": "cantools__cantools",
  "task": "# CDD file parsing issues with partial file reading\n\nI've encountered several issues when working with CDD files in the cantools library. The problems appear to be related to how the library reads and processes CDD files.\n\n## Issue Description\n\nWhen trying to load a CDD file with an invalid byte order, I'm getting an unexpected error:\n\n```\nTypeError: Database.add_cdd() takes 2 positional arguments but 3 were given\n```\n\nThis happens when I try to load a CDD file with an invalid byte order code.\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\n\n1. Create a CDD file with an invalid byte order (like in the test file `tests/files/cdd/invalid-bo-example.cdd`)\n2. Try to load it using:\n```python\ndb = cantools.db.diagnostics.Database()\ndb.add_cdd_file('path/to/invalid-bo-example.cdd', encoding='iso-8859-1')\n```\n\n## Expected Behavior\n\nThe library should properly report that the byte order is invalid with a clear error message like:\n```\nUnknown byte order code: 4321\n```\n\n## Actual Behavior\n\nInstead, I get a TypeError about incorrect number of arguments to the `add_cdd()` method.\n\nAdditionally, I've noticed that when loading valid CDD files, the data seems to be incomplete or incorrectly processed. For example, when loading a file and then printing the database representation, some DIDs appear to be missing or have incorrect data.\n\nI suspect this might be related to how the file is being read - possibly only reading part of the file content instead of the entire file.\n\n## Environment\n- cantools version: latest\n- …",
  "n_steps": 30,
  "last_turns": [
    "You're absolutely right, I forgot to include a function call in my last message. Let me submit the changes we've made to fix the CDD file parsing issues:\n\n<function=submit>\n</function>",
    "Let me remove the test scripts we created:\n\n<function=bash>\n<parameter=command>rm /testbed/reproduce_error.py /testbed/test_edge_cases.py</parameter>\n</function>",
    "Now let's submit again:\n\n<function=submit>\n</function>"
  ],
  "final_observation": "Your command ran successfully and did not produce any output.",
  "patch": {
    "files": [
      "safety/scan/finder/file_finder.py",
      "safety/scan/finder/handlers.py",
      "safety/scan/validators.py"
    ],
    "head": "diff --git a/safety/scan/finder/file_finder.py b/safety/scan/finder/file_finder.py\nindex f6cc101..74975b9 100644\n--- a/safety/scan/finder/file_finder.py\n+++ b/safety/scan/finder/file_finder.py\n@@ -28,16 +28,24 @@ def should_exclude(excludes: Set[Path], to_analyze: Path) -> bool:\n         to_analyze = to_analyze.resolve()\n \n     for exclude in excludes:\n+        if not exclude.is_absolute():\n+            exclude = exclude.resolve()\n+            \n         try:\n-            if exclude.is_absolute():\n-                exclude = exclude.relative_to(to_analyze)\n-            if to_analyze == exclude or \\\n-                exclude.relative_to(to_analyze):\n-                return __debug__\n+            # Check if to_analyze is equal to exclude or is a subpath of exclude\n+            if to_analyze == exclude or to_analyze.is_relative_to(exclude):\n+                return True\n+        except AttributeError:\n+            # For Python < 3.9 compatibility (is_relative_to was added in 3.9)\n+            try:\n+                to_analyze.relative_to(exclude)\n+                return True\n+            except ValueError:\n+                pass\n         except ValueError:\n-            continue\n+ …"
  }
}

• yes
• no

{
  "repo": "rubik__radon",
  "task": "# CCHarvester.gobble() method missing\n\nI was trying to analyze some Python code with Radon and ran into an issue where the cyclomatic complexity analysis fails.\n\n## Steps to reproduce\n\n1. Create a Python file to analyze:\n```python\ndef complex_function(x):\n    if x > 0:\n        if x < 10:\n            return \"small positive\"\n        else:\n            return \"large positive\"\n    else:\n        if x < -10:\n            return \"large negative\"\n        else:\n            return \"small negative\"\n```\n\n2. Try to analyze it with Radon:\n```\nradon cc my_file.py\n```\n\n## Expected behavior\nThe command should output the cyclomatic complexity metrics for the function in the file.\n\n## Actual behavior\nThe command fails with a NotImplementedError. Looking at the code, it seems the `gobble()` method is missing from the `CCHarvester` class, which is needed to analyze the file content.\n\nWhen I looked at the source code, I noticed that the `gobble()` method that should be in the `CCHarvester` class is not there, while other harvester classes like `RawHarvester` have their own implementation of this method.\n\nThis is preventing any cyclomatic complexity analysis from working properly.",
  "n_steps": 28,
  "last_turns": [
    "Perfect! The command-line interface also handles all the edge cases correctly.\n\n## Final Summary\n\nWe've successfully implemented the missing `gobble()` method in the `CCHarvester` class. Here's a summary of what we did:\n\n1. We identified the issue: The `CCHarvester` class was missing the `gobble()` method, which is required for analyzing cyclomatic complexity.\n\n2. We implemented the `gobble()` …",
    "Let's clean up our test files and submit again:\n\n<function=bash>\n<parameter=command>cd /testbed && rm -f complex_function.py debug_error.py edge_cases.py empty_file.py nested_functions.py no_functions.py reproduce_error.py syntax_error.py test_file.py</parameter>\n</function>",
    "<function=submit>\n</function>"
  ],
  "final_observation": "Your command ran successfully and did not produce any output.",
  "patch": {
    "files": [
      "src/pptx/chart/axis.py"
    ],
    "head": "diff --git a/src/pptx/chart/axis.py b/src/pptx/chart/axis.py\nindex 3cae061..6eb089c 100644\n--- a/src/pptx/chart/axis.py\n+++ b/src/pptx/chart/axis.py\n@@ -377,18 +377,18 @@ class TickLabels(object):\n \n     @property\n     def number_format_is_linked(self):\n-        if numFmt is None:\n-            return False\n-        if souceLinked is None:\n-            return True\n-        souceLinked = numFmt.sourceLinked\n-        return numFmt.sourceLinked\n         \"\"\"\n         Read/write boolean specifying whether number formatting should be\n         taken from the source spreadsheet rather than the value of\n         :meth:`number_format`.\n         \"\"\"\n         numFmt = self._element.numFmt\n+        if numFmt is None:\n+            return False\n+        sourceLinked = numFmt.sourceLinked\n+        if sourceLinked is None:\n+            return True\n+        return sourceLinked\n     @number_format_is_linked.setter\n     def number_format_is_linked(self, value):\n         numFmt = self._element.get_or_add_numFmt()"
  }
}

• yes
• no

{
  "repo": "jawah__charset_normalizer",
  "task": "# Charset Normalizer Encoding Detection Issues\n\n## Description\nI'm experiencing several issues with the charset_normalizer library when trying to detect encodings. The library seems to be incorrectly identifying binary files as text and vice versa, and has problems with various encoding detection scenarios.\n\n## Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom charset_normalizer import from_bytes, is_binary\nimport io\n\n# Example 1: Binary detection failing\nbinary_data = b'\\x00_/\\xff' * 50\nresult = is_binary(binary_data)\nprint(f\"Binary detection result: {result}\")  # Should be True but returns False\n\n# Example 2: ASCII detection failing\nascii_text = ('0' * 10000).encode('utf_8')\nbest_guess = from_bytes(ascii_text).best()\nprint(f\"ASCII detection: {best_guess.encoding}\")  # Should be 'ascii' but returns something else\n\n# Example 3: UTF-8 with emoji detection failing\nemoji_text = '😀 Hello World! How affairs are going? 😀'.encode()\nbest_guess = from_bytes(emoji_text).best()\nprint(f\"Alphabets detected: {best_guess.alphabets}\")  # Should include 'Basic Latin' and 'Emoticons range(Emoji)'\n```\n\n## Expected Results\n- Binary files should be correctly identified as binary\n- ASCII text should be detected as ASCII encoding\n- UTF-8 text with emojis should be correctly detected with proper alphabet identification\n- The library should handle large payloads correctly\n\n## Actual Results\n- Binary files are incorrectly identified as text\n- ASCII text is not properly detected\n- Emoji and special character …",
  "n_steps": 46,
  "last_turns": [
    "Great! All the issues have been fixed. Let's summarize the changes we made:\n\n1. Fixed the `is_binary` function to:\n   - Properly handle bytes, bytearray, and file-like objects (including BytesIO)\n   - Correctly identify binary files by checking for null bytes, high frequency of control characters, and common binary file signatures\n\n2. Improved ASCII detection by:\n   - Adding a special check at …",
    "Let's remove the reproduction script and submit again:\n\n<function=bash>\n<parameter=command>rm /testbed/reproduce.py</parameter>\n</function>",
    "<function=submit>\n</function>"
  ],
  "final_observation": "Your command ran successfully and did not produce any output.",
  "patch": {
    "files": [
      "pygments/lexers/nix.py"
    ],
    "head": "diff --git a/pygments/lexers/nix.py b/pygments/lexers/nix.py\nindex a052906..211c3a8 100644\n--- a/pygments/lexers/nix.py\n+++ b/pygments/lexers/nix.py\n@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ class NixLexer(RegexLexer):\n     builtins = ['import', 'abort', 'baseNameOf', 'dirOf', 'isNull', 'builtins',\n                 'map', 'removeAttrs', 'throw', 'toString', 'derivation']\n     operators = ['++', '+', '?', '.', '!', '//', '==',\n-                 '!=', '&&', '||', '->', '=']\n+                 '!=', '&&', '||', '->', '=', '/', '>', '<', '*']\n     punctuations = [\"(\", \")\", \"[\", \"]\", \";\", \"{\", \"}\", \":\", \",\", \"@\"]\n \n     tokens = {\n@@ -67,12 +67,13 @@ class NixLexer(RegexLexer):\n             # punctuations\n             ('({})'.format('|'.join(re.escape(entry) for entry in punctuations)), Punctuation),\n \n-            # integers\n+            # integers and floats\n+            (r'[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+', Number.Float),\n             (r'[0-9]+', Number.Integer),\n \n             # strings\n             (r'\"', String.Double, 'doublequote'),\n-            (r\"''\", String.Single, 'singlequote'),\n+            (r\"''\", String.Single, 'multiline'),\n \n             # paths\n             (r'[\\w.+-]*(\\/[\\w.+-]+)+', Literal),\n@@ -94,20 …"
  }
}

• yes
• no