Skip to samples
Typed Decision Bench · tasks · Safety and quality

unfair-tos-clause-type

compliance verification · consumer legal · 200 items · primary question type choice. Source nguha/legalbench (CC-BY-4.0); labels are expert labels, never an LLM judge. Download these samples (JSON).

SystemDecisionScoreAccuracy (top pick)Answered
JevFish87.383.5%200 / 200
Jev85.982.0%200 / 200
OpenJev83.980.5%200 / 200
decider-2b83.580.0%200 / 200
System One Scorer79.178.0%200 / 200
NanoJev60.825.5%200 / 200
Sample 1 of 6 · safety-and-quality:tos-14 · 55 state tokens (common tier)

Turn 1 — the request (identical for every system)

State (JSON)
{
  "clause": "by continuing to access or use the site or services after we have posted a modification on the site or have provided you with notice of a modification , you are indicating that you agree to be bound by the modified terms .",
  "document_type": "consumer terms of service"
}

Question unfair_term_type · choice · primary (ranked)

The state holds one sentence from a consumer terms-of-service document. Which one category of potentially unfair contractual term (EU consumer-protection law) does the clause fall into? Pick other when it is none of the eight.

9 options
  • arbitration — Requires or allows disputes to be settled by arbitration rather than in court.
  • unilateral_change — Lets the provider change the terms or the service at will, without the user's consent.
  • content_removal — Lets the provider remove the user's content or account at its discretion.
  • jurisdiction — Fixes the courts or place where disputes must be brought.
  • choice_of_law — Fixes which country's or state's law governs the contract.
  • limitation_of_liability — Excludes or limits the provider's liability for damages or losses.
  • unilateral_termination — Lets the provider terminate the contract or account at will.
  • contract_by_using — States that using the service counts as accepting the terms.
  • other — None of the eight unfair-term categories.

Turn 2 — each system's response · Turn 3 — the grade

Expected answer: contract_by_using

SystemTop pickGradeP(expected)Proper scoreDistribution
JevFishcontract_by_usingcorrect79.3%0.963
  • contract_by_using 79.3%
  • unilateral_change 17.3%
  • other 3.3%
  • unilateral_termination 0.1%
  • jurisdiction 0.1%
  • limitation_of_liability 0.0%
Jevunilateral_changewrong33.0%0.551
  • unilateral_change 67.0%
  • contract_by_using 33.0%
  • choice_of_law 0.0%
  • jurisdiction 0.0%
  • content_removal 0.0%
  • unilateral_termination 0.0%
OpenJevunilateral_changewrong18.5%0.343
  • unilateral_change 80.5%
  • contract_by_using 18.5%
  • other 0.5%
  • unilateral_termination 0.2%
  • arbitration 0.1%
  • limitation_of_liability 0.1%
decider-2bcontract_by_usingcorrect91.5%0.995
  • contract_by_using 91.5%
  • unilateral_change 4.9%
  • other 2.7%
  • unilateral_termination 0.2%
  • jurisdiction 0.2%
  • content_removal 0.2%
System One Scorercontract_by_usingcorrect70.6%0.944
  • contract_by_using 70.6%
  • other 12.6%
  • unilateral_change 9.1%
  • unilateral_termination 2.0%
  • arbitration 1.6%
  • jurisdiction 1.3%
NanoJevcontract_by_usingcorrect32.4%0.737
  • contract_by_using 32.4%
  • other 15.8%
  • choice_of_law 11.2%
  • unilateral_change 10.5%
  • limitation_of_liability 8.8%
  • unilateral_termination 7.0%
Sample 2 of 6 · safety-and-quality:tos-2204 · 42 state tokens (common tier)

Turn 1 — the request (identical for every system)

State (JSON)
{
  "clause": "crowdtangle may change these terms of service , as described above , notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in any agreement between you and crowdtangle .",
  "document_type": "consumer terms of service"
}

Question unfair_term_type · choice · primary (ranked)

The state holds one sentence from a consumer terms-of-service document. Which one category of potentially unfair contractual term (EU consumer-protection law) does the clause fall into? Pick other when it is none of the eight.

9 options
  • arbitration — Requires or allows disputes to be settled by arbitration rather than in court.
  • unilateral_change — Lets the provider change the terms or the service at will, without the user's consent.
  • content_removal — Lets the provider remove the user's content or account at its discretion.
  • jurisdiction — Fixes the courts or place where disputes must be brought.
  • choice_of_law — Fixes which country's or state's law governs the contract.
  • limitation_of_liability — Excludes or limits the provider's liability for damages or losses.
  • unilateral_termination — Lets the provider terminate the contract or account at will.
  • contract_by_using — States that using the service counts as accepting the terms.
  • other — None of the eight unfair-term categories.

Turn 2 — each system's response · Turn 3 — the grade

Expected answer: unilateral_change

SystemTop pickGradeP(expected)Proper scoreDistribution
JevFishunilateral_changecorrect98.2%1.000
  • unilateral_change 98.2%
  • other 1.1%
  • contract_by_using 0.4%
  • unilateral_termination 0.2%
  • limitation_of_liability 0.1%
  • content_removal 0.0%
Jevunilateral_changecorrect100.0%1.000
  • unilateral_change 100.0%
  • arbitration 0.0%
  • content_removal 0.0%
  • unilateral_termination 0.0%
  • other 0.0%
  • contract_by_using 0.0%
OpenJevunilateral_changecorrect100.0%1.000
  • unilateral_change 100.0%
  • limitation_of_liability 0.0%
  • arbitration 0.0%
  • contract_by_using 0.0%
  • other 0.0%
  • choice_of_law 0.0%
decider-2bunilateral_changecorrect97.0%0.999
  • unilateral_change 97.0%
  • other 1.3%
  • unilateral_termination 0.5%
  • contract_by_using 0.3%
  • limitation_of_liability 0.3%
  • content_removal 0.1%
System One Scorerunilateral_changecorrect63.8%0.919
  • unilateral_change 63.8%
  • other 14.7%
  • contract_by_using 6.6%
  • unilateral_termination 4.7%
  • choice_of_law 2.7%
  • arbitration 2.1%
NanoJevunilateral_changecorrect21.4%0.646
  • unilateral_change 21.4%
  • contract_by_using 16.7%
  • other 13.5%
  • unilateral_termination 11.2%
  • choice_of_law 10.5%
  • content_removal 8.7%
Sample 3 of 6 · safety-and-quality:tos-2708 · 34 state tokens (common tier)

Turn 1 — the request (identical for every system)

State (JSON)
{
  "clause": "headspace will enforce its trademark rights to the fullest extent of the law , including the seeking of criminal prosecution .",
  "document_type": "consumer terms of service"
}

Question unfair_term_type · choice · primary (ranked)

The state holds one sentence from a consumer terms-of-service document. Which one category of potentially unfair contractual term (EU consumer-protection law) does the clause fall into? Pick other when it is none of the eight.

9 options
  • arbitration — Requires or allows disputes to be settled by arbitration rather than in court.
  • unilateral_change — Lets the provider change the terms or the service at will, without the user's consent.
  • content_removal — Lets the provider remove the user's content or account at its discretion.
  • jurisdiction — Fixes the courts or place where disputes must be brought.
  • choice_of_law — Fixes which country's or state's law governs the contract.
  • limitation_of_liability — Excludes or limits the provider's liability for damages or losses.
  • unilateral_termination — Lets the provider terminate the contract or account at will.
  • contract_by_using — States that using the service counts as accepting the terms.
  • other — None of the eight unfair-term categories.

Turn 2 — each system's response · Turn 3 — the grade

Expected answer: other

SystemTop pickGradeP(expected)Proper scoreDistribution
JevFishothercorrect74.4%0.957
  • other 74.4%
  • limitation_of_liability 13.4%
  • jurisdiction 4.5%
  • contract_by_using 2.0%
  • choice_of_law 1.8%
  • content_removal 1.6%
Jevothercorrect100.0%1.000
  • other 100.0%
  • content_removal 0.0%
  • choice_of_law 0.0%
  • limitation_of_liability 0.0%
  • contract_by_using 0.0%
  • jurisdiction 0.0%
OpenJevothercorrect99.9%1.000
  • other 99.9%
  • arbitration 0.0%
  • unilateral_change 0.0%
  • limitation_of_liability 0.0%
  • contract_by_using 0.0%
  • jurisdiction 0.0%
decider-2bothercorrect43.8%0.783
  • other 43.8%
  • limitation_of_liability 32.8%
  • choice_of_law 7.0%
  • unilateral_termination 5.3%
  • jurisdiction 3.8%
  • content_removal 2.6%
System One Scorerothercorrect41.7%0.803
  • other 41.7%
  • contract_by_using 15.7%
  • unilateral_termination 9.3%
  • jurisdiction 7.4%
  • choice_of_law 6.9%
  • arbitration 6.7%
NanoJevcontract_by_usingwrong15.6%0.588
  • contract_by_using 22.8%
  • other 15.6%
  • choice_of_law 13.6%
  • unilateral_termination 10.8%
  • limitation_of_liability 8.7%
  • content_removal 8.3%
Sample 4 of 6 · safety-and-quality:tos-373 · 52 state tokens (common tier)

Turn 1 — the request (identical for every system)

State (JSON)
{
  "clause": "a download speed of at least 25.0 mbps per stream is recommended to receive ultra hd ( defined as a resolution of 1080p or higher ) and hdr content .",
  "document_type": "consumer terms of service"
}

Question unfair_term_type · choice · primary (ranked)

The state holds one sentence from a consumer terms-of-service document. Which one category of potentially unfair contractual term (EU consumer-protection law) does the clause fall into? Pick other when it is none of the eight.

9 options
  • arbitration — Requires or allows disputes to be settled by arbitration rather than in court.
  • unilateral_change — Lets the provider change the terms or the service at will, without the user's consent.
  • content_removal — Lets the provider remove the user's content or account at its discretion.
  • jurisdiction — Fixes the courts or place where disputes must be brought.
  • choice_of_law — Fixes which country's or state's law governs the contract.
  • limitation_of_liability — Excludes or limits the provider's liability for damages or losses.
  • unilateral_termination — Lets the provider terminate the contract or account at will.
  • contract_by_using — States that using the service counts as accepting the terms.
  • other — None of the eight unfair-term categories.

Turn 2 — each system's response · Turn 3 — the grade

Expected answer: other

SystemTop pickGradeP(expected)Proper scoreDistribution
JevFishothercorrect95.3%0.998
  • other 95.3%
  • contract_by_using 3.3%
  • limitation_of_liability 1.0%
  • unilateral_change 0.1%
  • unilateral_termination 0.1%
  • jurisdiction 0.1%
Jevothercorrect100.0%1.000
  • other 100.0%
  • jurisdiction 0.0%
  • arbitration 0.0%
  • unilateral_change 0.0%
  • content_removal 0.0%
  • contract_by_using 0.0%
OpenJevothercorrect100.0%1.000
  • other 100.0%
  • unilateral_change 0.0%
  • arbitration 0.0%
  • limitation_of_liability 0.0%
  • choice_of_law 0.0%
  • contract_by_using 0.0%
decider-2bothercorrect89.8%0.993
  • other 89.8%
  • contract_by_using 4.0%
  • limitation_of_liability 3.6%
  • choice_of_law 0.7%
  • unilateral_change 0.6%
  • unilateral_termination 0.5%
System One Scorerothercorrect63.2%0.921
  • other 63.2%
  • contract_by_using 11.4%
  • arbitration 5.6%
  • jurisdiction 4.4%
  • limitation_of_liability 4.0%
  • choice_of_law 3.9%
NanoJevcontract_by_usingwrong12.9%0.565
  • contract_by_using 20.7%
  • choice_of_law 13.1%
  • other 12.9%
  • unilateral_termination 11.4%
  • content_removal 10.0%
  • limitation_of_liability 9.7%
Sample 5 of 6 · safety-and-quality:tos-613 · 43 state tokens (common tier)

Turn 1 — the request (identical for every system)

State (JSON)
{
  "clause": "nothing in the terms gives you a right to use the twitter name or any of the twitter trademarks , logos , domain names , and other distinctive brand features .",
  "document_type": "consumer terms of service"
}

Question unfair_term_type · choice · primary (ranked)

The state holds one sentence from a consumer terms-of-service document. Which one category of potentially unfair contractual term (EU consumer-protection law) does the clause fall into? Pick other when it is none of the eight.

9 options
  • arbitration — Requires or allows disputes to be settled by arbitration rather than in court.
  • unilateral_change — Lets the provider change the terms or the service at will, without the user's consent.
  • content_removal — Lets the provider remove the user's content or account at its discretion.
  • jurisdiction — Fixes the courts or place where disputes must be brought.
  • choice_of_law — Fixes which country's or state's law governs the contract.
  • limitation_of_liability — Excludes or limits the provider's liability for damages or losses.
  • unilateral_termination — Lets the provider terminate the contract or account at will.
  • contract_by_using — States that using the service counts as accepting the terms.
  • other — None of the eight unfair-term categories.

Turn 2 — each system's response · Turn 3 — the grade

Expected answer: other

SystemTop pickGradeP(expected)Proper scoreDistribution
JevFishothercorrect78.6%0.968
  • other 78.6%
  • contract_by_using 10.5%
  • limitation_of_liability 8.8%
  • unilateral_termination 1.1%
  • unilateral_change 0.3%
  • jurisdiction 0.3%
Jevothercorrect100.0%1.000
  • other 100.0%
  • content_removal 0.0%
  • unilateral_change 0.0%
  • jurisdiction 0.0%
  • arbitration 0.0%
  • unilateral_termination 0.0%
OpenJevothercorrect99.9%1.000
  • other 99.9%
  • limitation_of_liability 0.0%
  • arbitration 0.0%
  • unilateral_change 0.0%
  • contract_by_using 0.0%
  • unilateral_termination 0.0%
decider-2bothercorrect43.9%0.777
  • other 43.9%
  • limitation_of_liability 32.9%
  • contract_by_using 14.5%
  • unilateral_termination 3.0%
  • choice_of_law 1.5%
  • unilateral_change 1.4%
System One Scorerothercorrect49.0%0.833
  • other 49.0%
  • contract_by_using 25.3%
  • unilateral_termination 5.4%
  • arbitration 4.9%
  • limitation_of_liability 4.3%
  • jurisdiction 3.7%
NanoJevothercorrect29.8%0.717
  • other 29.8%
  • contract_by_using 16.7%
  • unilateral_termination 11.5%
  • content_removal 9.5%
  • choice_of_law 8.8%
  • limitation_of_liability 7.9%
Sample 6 of 6 · safety-and-quality:tos-618 · 108 state tokens (common tier)

Turn 1 — the request (identical for every system)

State (JSON)
{
  "clause": "we may suspend or terminate your account or cease providing you with all or part of the services at any time for any or no reason , including , but not limited to , if we reasonably believe : ( i ) you have violated these terms or the twitter rules , ( ii ) you create risk or possible legal exposure for us ; ( iii ) your account should be removed due to prolonged inactivity ; or ( iv ) our provision of the services to you is no longer commercially viable .",
  "document_type": "consumer terms of service"
}

Question unfair_term_type · choice · primary (ranked)

The state holds one sentence from a consumer terms-of-service document. Which one category of potentially unfair contractual term (EU consumer-protection law) does the clause fall into? Pick other when it is none of the eight.

9 options
  • arbitration — Requires or allows disputes to be settled by arbitration rather than in court.
  • unilateral_change — Lets the provider change the terms or the service at will, without the user's consent.
  • content_removal — Lets the provider remove the user's content or account at its discretion.
  • jurisdiction — Fixes the courts or place where disputes must be brought.
  • choice_of_law — Fixes which country's or state's law governs the contract.
  • limitation_of_liability — Excludes or limits the provider's liability for damages or losses.
  • unilateral_termination — Lets the provider terminate the contract or account at will.
  • contract_by_using — States that using the service counts as accepting the terms.
  • other — None of the eight unfair-term categories.

Turn 2 — each system's response · Turn 3 — the grade

Expected answer: unilateral_termination

SystemTop pickGradeP(expected)Proper scoreDistribution
JevFishunilateral_terminationcorrect88.3%0.990
  • unilateral_termination 88.3%
  • content_removal 7.5%
  • other 2.5%
  • unilateral_change 1.5%
  • limitation_of_liability 0.1%
  • jurisdiction 0.1%
Jevunilateral_terminationcorrect100.0%1.000
  • unilateral_termination 100.0%
  • arbitration 0.0%
  • other 0.0%
  • limitation_of_liability 0.0%
  • unilateral_change 0.0%
  • jurisdiction 0.0%
OpenJevunilateral_terminationcorrect99.8%1.000
  • unilateral_termination 99.8%
  • unilateral_change 0.2%
  • content_removal 0.0%
  • limitation_of_liability 0.0%
  • other 0.0%
  • arbitration 0.0%
decider-2bunilateral_terminationcorrect80.5%0.973
  • unilateral_termination 80.5%
  • content_removal 11.8%
  • unilateral_change 5.0%
  • other 1.9%
  • limitation_of_liability 0.4%
  • jurisdiction 0.2%
System One Scorerunilateral_terminationcorrect83.8%0.984
  • unilateral_termination 83.8%
  • other 4.2%
  • unilateral_change 3.8%
  • content_removal 3.5%
  • contract_by_using 2.2%
  • limitation_of_liability 0.8%
NanoJevunilateral_terminationcorrect29.7%0.712
  • unilateral_termination 29.7%
  • other 17.8%
  • content_removal 14.6%
  • contract_by_using 9.8%
  • limitation_of_liability 9.1%
  • choice_of_law 7.7%