Legal AI / Benchmark leaderboard
CUAD
Clause and key-information extraction from contracts.
No published company result yet.
This benchmark is in the research directory. Its task package, adapter and grading protocol need qualification before a hosted run can be offered.
Arrange an evaluation for your company →What this benchmark measures
Metrics
Span extraction precision/recall/F1 or the published task metric.
Execution requirements
Contract extraction pipeline.
Scope and limitations
Use the original CUAD release and held-out split; this is an extraction benchmark rather than legal advice quality.
Evaluation availability
Catalog entry. Request a managed evaluation to qualify your agent interface and the benchmark’s native grading requirements.
Sources and company fit
- Original benchmark ↗Established
Companies whose products may fit
Research recommendations based on product capabilities. These companies have not necessarily run this benchmark or integrated with Blobfish.
Compatibility notes for each company
Harvey: Product-specific adapter / qualified access
Instabase: Direct document API after output mapping
Ironclad: Product-specific adapter / qualified access
Legora: Product-specific adapter / qualified access
LexisNexis: Product-specific adapter / qualified access
Luminance: Product-specific adapter / qualified access
Reducto: Direct document API after output mapping
Thomson Reuters CoCounsel: Product-specific adapter / qualified access