TASK
Conflict-Of-Interest Review control gap rejection

Investigate the anchor conflict-of-interest review, document a material control gap and reject the item, preserve an auditable chain of evidence, and finish with a documented manager rejection.

SEEDED CONTEXT
[{"bindings": {"actor_id": ["harbor-litigation-legal_conflicts-operator-a", "harbor-litigation-legal_conflicts-manager"], "assignee_id": ["harbor-litigation-legal_conflicts-operator-a"], "conflict_case_id": ["conflict_cas_a51b157dae79f4ba"], "kind": ["supporting-evidence"], "priority": ["high"]}, "namespace": "legal_conflicts"}]

SUCCESS CRITERIA
[{"comparator": "eq", "expected": "Blocked", "field": "status", "namespace": "legal_conflicts"}, {"comparator": "eq", "expected": 2, "field": "audit events with action 'advance' (exactly)", "namespace": "legal_conflicts"}, {"comparator": "eq", "expected": 0, "field": "audit events with action 'approve' (exactly)", "namespace": "legal_conflicts"}, {"comparator": "eq", "expected": 1, "field": "audit events with action 'reject' (exactly)", "namespace": "legal_conflicts"}, {"comparator": "eq", "expected": 0, "field": "audit events with action 'reopen' (exactly)", "namespace": "legal_conflicts"}, {"comparator": "gte", "expected": 1, "field": "audit events with action 'note' (at least)", "namespace": "legal_conflicts"}, {"comparator": "gte", "expected": 1, "field": "audit events with action 'attach_document' (at least)", "namespace": "legal_conflicts"}, {"comparator": "gte", "expected": 1, "field": "audit events with action 'set_amount' (at least)", "namespace": "legal_conflicts"}, {"comparator": "eq", "expected": "harbor-litigation-legal_conflicts-operator-a", "field": "assigned_to", "namespace": "legal_conflicts"}, {"comparator": "eq", "expected": "high", "field": "priority", "namespace": "legal_conflicts"}, {"comparator": "eq", "expected": 25000, "field": "amount", "namespace": "legal_conflicts"}, {"comparator": "eq", "expected": "control-gap-rejection control decision", "field": "rejection_reason", "namespace": "legal_conflicts"}]

Use the available tools against the seeded synthetic environment. Read current state before mutating it, honor workflow preconditions, preserve evidence and audit history, and use an independent approver where required. Do not invent identifiers or claim success before the state criteria are satisfied. Finish with a concise operational summary.
